Court Allows Blockchain.com’s Trademark Lawsuit Against Paymium to Proceed

Must Read

Bitcoin Bull Rally Incoming? Market Price Keeping Below the Production Cost Ahead of Halving

Bitcoin is staying above its crucial level $9,000 for sometime now while experiencing some...

Trader shares the “Very Reason All Investors Should Hold some Bitcoin”

In 2020, the price of the leading asset had one of its worst one-day drops...

Bitcoin Sees an Influx of Retail Interest with Investors Doubling Down on HODLing

After tumbling down to below $6,500 yet again, Bitcoin went back above $7,000 in...
- Advertisement -BTCClicks.com Banner
Earn Free Bitcoin

The New York Federal Court denied the motion to dismiss the ruling in the trademark infringement action by cryptocurrency wallet and exchange operator Blockchain.com against fintech startup Paymium and its CEO Pierre Noizat over the use of domain “blockchain.io”.

According to the court documents published on Aug. 7, the lawsuit, originally filed by Blockchain.com in September 2018, claimed that Paymium and its Blockchain.io platform not only infringed on the trademark, but also were involved in alleged unfair competition and false advertising.

Blockchain versus Blockchain

In February 2019, Paymium moved a motion “to dismiss the amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted […] and for lack of personal jurisdiction over Pierre Noizat.”

In its turn, Blockchain.com successfully managed to argue that their marks were not inherently descriptive and acquired secondary meaning, and that Blockchain.com and Blockchain.io marks were substantially similar enough for the case to proceed.

The New York Federal Court denied the trademark infringement part of the Paymium’s motion and allowed the suit to continue.

You don’t mess with the SEC

The court also found Paymium’s advertising claims that the “filing has been accepted and [it is] now registered with the SEC!” to be false, so this part stays in the lawsuit too. 

In reality, the only thing the startup registered at that time with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission was a Form D. Blockchain.com argued that “the filing of a Form D does not mean that a security is ‘registered’ or that it has been in any way scrutinized or approved by the SEC.” The court agreed.

At the same time, all claims against Pierre Noizat were dismissed due to the actual lack of personal jurisdiction. The court also argued that the advertising of “hack-free status and atomic swaps” was not false.

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

Latest News

Wyoming Amends Insurance Code to Allow Insurance Companies to Invest in Bitcoin & other Cryptos

In the first provision of its kind, Wyoming is allowing the domestic insurers to invest...
- Advertisement -Earn Free Bitcoin

Its’ Finally Here A 100% Local Non-Custodial P2P Cryptocurrency Marketplace.

Finfreeotc is soon launching a one of a kind peer to peer cryptocurrency market place. Their marketplace is 100% non-custodial,...

WorldMarkets continues with the success of its trading artificial intelligence

Today we live in the information age, and access to information is unlimited. And that produces the paradox of misinformation. That's why...

MyTvchain.com Records Growth for The First Blockchain ​​Web Tv Platform Dedicated to Sport Clubs And Athletes

Sophia Antipolis (France) and Singapore: The first web TV platform dedicated to sports clubs and athletes opened in...

Crypto-Broker Instacoins Receives Operating License in Estonia

Instacoins Estonia OÜ, a cryptocurrency brokerage, is pleased to announce it has received an operating license from the Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU). The...