Court Allows Blockchain.com’s Trademark Lawsuit Against Paymium to Proceed

Must Read

Get Bitcoin with Arcade Games

RollerCoin is an online, virtual bitcoin mining game where you compete against your friends to mine bitcoins....

Visa and Mastercard Raise fees, Merchants faces towards Crypto

Credit card providers charge merchants a cut of the payments they accept, called interchange fees or swipe...

Get $200 Bitcoin for free hourly

Win upto $200 in Bitcoins every hour, no strings attached! Multiply your bitcoins, free weekly lottery with...
- Advertisement -
Earn Free Bitcoin

The New York Federal Court denied the motion to dismiss the ruling in the trademark infringement action by cryptocurrency wallet and exchange operator Blockchain.com against fintech startup Paymium and its CEO Pierre Noizat over the use of domain “blockchain.io”.

According to the court documents published on Aug. 7, the lawsuit, originally filed by Blockchain.com in September 2018, claimed that Paymium and its Blockchain.io platform not only infringed on the trademark, but also were involved in alleged unfair competition and false advertising.

Blockchain versus Blockchain

In February 2019, Paymium moved a motion “to dismiss the amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted […] and for lack of personal jurisdiction over Pierre Noizat.”

In its turn, Blockchain.com successfully managed to argue that their marks were not inherently descriptive and acquired secondary meaning, and that Blockchain.com and Blockchain.io marks were substantially similar enough for the case to proceed.

The New York Federal Court denied the trademark infringement part of the Paymium’s motion and allowed the suit to continue.

You don’t mess with the SEC

The court also found Paymium’s advertising claims that the “filing has been accepted and [it is] now registered with the SEC!” to be false, so this part stays in the lawsuit too. 

In reality, the only thing the startup registered at that time with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission was a Form D. Blockchain.com argued that “the filing of a Form D does not mean that a security is ‘registered’ or that it has been in any way scrutinized or approved by the SEC.” The court agreed.

At the same time, all claims against Pierre Noizat were dismissed due to the actual lack of personal jurisdiction. The court also argued that the advertising of “hack-free status and atomic swaps” was not false.

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

Latest News

Visa and Mastercard Raise fees, Merchants faces towards Crypto

Credit card providers charge merchants a cut of the payments they accept, called interchange fees or swipe...
- Advertisement -Earn Free Bitcoin

CubeBit has come forward to sponsor Future Blockchain Summit 2020

November-18-20 - CubeBit 2.0 has come forward to sponsor Future Blockchain Summit 2020. The event will be held at the Dubai World Trade Centre,...

USDT Is A Game Changer For Online Poker

CoinPoker - the flagman of the industry, the biggest and the oldest pure crypto poker room is the first to...

DeepTradeBot: The innovation of large companies at your service

DeepTradeBot is a collection of automated trading tools developed by Deep Neuro Networks LTD, a London, England-based company dedicated to artificial intelligence and...

Flyp.me Instant Crypto Exchange Now Supports REN Token Trading

Decentralized finance is leading the way of the cryptocurrency industry, with the REN Protocol at the front. REN Protocol is...