Court Allows Blockchain.com’s Trademark Lawsuit Against Paymium to Proceed

Must Read

Can XRP defend its price?

Could XRP defend its price action, and rise back to $0.30? Here is my view on how...

With a 110% increase in crypto wallet adoption rates in 2020 are we set for another Bitcoin boom?

2020 has been a massive year for crypto adoption. In July alone, over 3.5 million crypto wallet app downloads...

DeepTradeBot: The innovation of large companies at your service

DeepTradeBot is a collection of automated trading tools developed by Deep Neuro Networks LTD, a London, England-based company...
- Advertisement -BTCClicks.com Banner
Earn Free Bitcoin

The New York Federal Court denied the motion to dismiss the ruling in the trademark infringement action by cryptocurrency wallet and exchange operator Blockchain.com against fintech startup Paymium and its CEO Pierre Noizat over the use of domain “blockchain.io”.

According to the court documents published on Aug. 7, the lawsuit, originally filed by Blockchain.com in September 2018, claimed that Paymium and its Blockchain.io platform not only infringed on the trademark, but also were involved in alleged unfair competition and false advertising.

Blockchain versus Blockchain

In February 2019, Paymium moved a motion “to dismiss the amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted […] and for lack of personal jurisdiction over Pierre Noizat.”

In its turn, Blockchain.com successfully managed to argue that their marks were not inherently descriptive and acquired secondary meaning, and that Blockchain.com and Blockchain.io marks were substantially similar enough for the case to proceed.

The New York Federal Court denied the trademark infringement part of the Paymium’s motion and allowed the suit to continue.

You don’t mess with the SEC

The court also found Paymium’s advertising claims that the “filing has been accepted and [it is] now registered with the SEC!” to be false, so this part stays in the lawsuit too. 

In reality, the only thing the startup registered at that time with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission was a Form D. Blockchain.com argued that “the filing of a Form D does not mean that a security is ‘registered’ or that it has been in any way scrutinized or approved by the SEC.” The court agreed.

At the same time, all claims against Pierre Noizat were dismissed due to the actual lack of personal jurisdiction. The court also argued that the advertising of “hack-free status and atomic swaps” was not false.

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

Latest News

Wyoming Amends Insurance Code to Allow Insurance Companies to Invest in Bitcoin & other Cryptos

In the first provision of its kind, Wyoming is allowing the domestic insurers to invest...
- Advertisement -Earn Free Bitcoin

Flyp.me Instant Crypto Exchange Now Supports REN Token Trading

Decentralized finance is leading the way of the cryptocurrency industry, with the REN Protocol at the front. REN Protocol is...

BLOCKCHAIN OVERCOMES POSSIBILITY OF FRAUD, LACK OF TRANSPARENCY AND TRUST IN THE GAMBLING INDUSTRY

DATE: 07/08/2020 In a recent study carried out by the UK Gambling Commission reveals that the gambling industry has...

The Kuailian Ecosystem, Bringing Blockchain Technology To The World

10 years have passed since the birth of Bitcoin and the first use of Blockchain, a technology that has not stopped evolving,...

Its’ Finally Here A 100% Local Non-Custodial P2P Cryptocurrency Marketplace.

Finfreeotc is soon launching a one of a kind peer to peer cryptocurrency market place. Their marketplace is 100% non-custodial,...