No menu items!
More

    Court Allows Blockchain.com’s Trademark Lawsuit Against Paymium to Proceed

    Must Read

    Over 10% of MoneyGram’s US-Mexico Business Is Crypto able

    An estimate by the World Bank pegged 2016’s global remittance market at $573 billion, and a whopping $422 billion...

    Hopefully We Can Operate With China’s Crypto Says Ethereum Co-Founder.

    Ethereum co-founder and founder of Consensys, Joseph Lubin, said that he hopes China’s Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC)...

    Chinese Police Hold MicroBT CEO Responsible For Dispute Against Bitmain

    The founder of Bitcoin mining rig manufacturer MicroBT is being held as of Nov. 8 by Shenzhen...
    - Advertisement -

    The New York Federal Court denied the motion to dismiss the ruling in the trademark infringement action by cryptocurrency wallet and exchange operator Blockchain.com against fintech startup Paymium and its CEO Pierre Noizat over the use of domain “blockchain.io”.

    According to the court documents published on Aug. 7, the lawsuit, originally filed by Blockchain.com in September 2018, claimed that Paymium and its Blockchain.io platform not only infringed on the trademark, but also were involved in alleged unfair competition and false advertising.

    Blockchain versus Blockchain

    In February 2019, Paymium moved a motion “to dismiss the amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted […] and for lack of personal jurisdiction over Pierre Noizat.”

    In its turn, Blockchain.com successfully managed to argue that their marks were not inherently descriptive and acquired secondary meaning, and that Blockchain.com and Blockchain.io marks were substantially similar enough for the case to proceed.

    The New York Federal Court denied the trademark infringement part of the Paymium’s motion and allowed the suit to continue.

    You don’t mess with the SEC

    The court also found Paymium’s advertising claims that the “filing has been accepted and [it is] now registered with the SEC!” to be false, so this part stays in the lawsuit too. 

    In reality, the only thing the startup registered at that time with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission was a Form D. Blockchain.com argued that “the filing of a Form D does not mean that a security is ‘registered’ or that it has been in any way scrutinized or approved by the SEC.” The court agreed.

    At the same time, all claims against Pierre Noizat were dismissed due to the actual lack of personal jurisdiction. The court also argued that the advertising of “hack-free status and atomic swaps” was not false.

    - Advertisement -
    - Advertisement -

    Latest News

    11 Years Ago Today Satoshi Nakamoto Published the Bitcoin White Paper

    Today, Oct. 31, marks eleven years since the publication of the Bitcoin white paper by the still-mysterious person or...
    - Advertisement -

    ArBinance is Changing the Crypto Arbitrage Game with the Click of a Button

    ArBinance is a professional arbitrage trading platform that aims to revolutionize cryptocurrency trading by allowing its users to conduct crypto arbitrage through...

    SmartMixer is Making Bitcoin Mixing Easier for a New Generation of Users

    SmartMixer is Making Bitcoin Mixing Easier for a New Generation of Users SmartMixer.io is a new bitcoin mixing service especially geared toward...

    Bitpanda goes global: Announcing the Bitpanda Global Exchange and the IEO for the ecosystem token BEST

    Bitpanda goes global: Announcing the Bitpanda Global Exchange and the IEO for the ecosystem token BEST Vienna-based fintech Bitpanda...

    Bitpanda digitizes physical gold and silver

    Vienna, 13 May 2019 – Vienna-based fintech Bitpanda launches gold and silver trading for its 1 million users. The new...